Pandit, Ramesh J.
Hinsu, Ankit T.
Patel, Namrata V.
Koringa, Prakash G.
Jakhesara, Subhash J.
Thakkar, Jalpa R.
Shah, Tejas M.
Limon, Georgina
Psifidi, Androniki
Guitian, Javier
Hume, David A.
Tomley, Fiona M.
Rank, Dharamshibhai N.
Raman, M.
Tirumurugaan, K. G.
Blake, Damer P.
Joshi, Chaitanya G.
Funding for this research was provided by:
Department of Biotechnology , Ministry of Science and Technology (BT/IN/Indo-UK/FADH/49/CGJ/2013)
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (GB) (BB/L00478X/1)
Article History
Received: 6 March 2018
Accepted: 13 June 2018
First Online: 23 June 2018
Ethics approval
: This study was carried out using welfare standards consistent with those established under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, an Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom. All protocols were approved by the Ethical Review Panel of Anand Agricultural University (AAU), the Institutional Animal Ethical Committee of the Madras Veterinary College and the Clinical Research Ethical Review Board (CRERB) of the Royal Veterinary College.
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.