Schulz, Frederik
Eloe-Fadrosh, Emiley A.
Bowers, Robert M.
Jarett, Jessica
Nielsen, Torben
Ivanova, Natalia N.
Kyrpides, Nikos C.
Woyke, Tanja
Funding for this research was provided by:
U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC02-05CH11231)
Article History
Received: 21 August 2017
Accepted: 3 October 2017
First Online: 17 October 2017
Change Date: 15 November 2017
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: Following publication of the original article [1], the authors pointed out that the figure shown as figure S1 is actually figure S2 and vice versa. Figure S1 should show the barcharts, and figure S2 should shows the heatmaps. Figures captions are in the correct order.<i>1) “...SILVA-only OTUs (37,066 97% OTUs and 1266 85% clusters) (Additional file 3:</i><b><i>Figure S2</i></b><i>)...”</i><b><i>- ></i></b> <i>...SILVA-only OTUs (37,066 97% OTUs and 1266 85% clusters) (Additional file 3:</i><b><i>Figure S1</i></b><i>)...”</i><i>2) “...in groundwater and soil (Fig. 2, Additional file 2:</i><b><i>Figure S1</i></b><i>).”</i><b><i>- ></i></b> <i>“in groundwater and soil (Fig. 2, Additional file 2:</i><b><i>Figure S2</i></b><i>).”</i><i>3) “...from genomes as training data (Additional file 3:</i><b><i>Figure S2</i></b><i>, ...”</i><b><i>- ></i></b> <i>“...from genomes as training data (Additional file 3:</i><b><i>Figure S1</i></b><i>, ...”</i><i>4) “...were predicted to be chimeric (Additional file 3:</i><b><i>Figure S2</i></b><i>)” - > “...were predicted to be chimeric (Additional file 3:</i><b><i>Figure S1</i></b><i>)”.</i>
Ethics approval and consent to participate
: Not applicable
: Not applicable
: The authors declare that they have no competing financial or non-financial interests.
: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.