Ratanawongsa, Neda http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9944-6923
Quan, Judy
Handley, Margaret A.
Sarkar, Urmimala
Schillinger, Dean
Funding for this research was provided by:
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (1K08HS022561, R18HS017261, 1R03HS020684)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (5U58DP002007)
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (1P30-DK092924)
Article History
Received: 5 October 2016
Accepted: 28 March 2018
First Online: 6 April 2018
Ethics approval
: The Committee on Human Research at the University of California, San Francisco (10–04689 and 13–10,752) approved collection of interview data by UCSF from consenting participants after obtaining verbal consent. Because all recruitment and implementation was conducted by SFHP by phone, it was felt that requiring a separate visit to obtain written consent at UCSF or the primary care clinic sites reduce participation, leading to selection bias, and disrupt clinic workflow. Because the interviews offered minimal risk, the Committee approved verbal telephone consent for these interviews.
: Not applicable
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.