Apollonio, Dorie E.
Broyde, Keren
Azzam, Amin
De Guia, Michael
Heilman, James
Brock, Tina http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7455-4063
Article History
Received: 18 December 2017
Accepted: 1 November 2018
First Online: 20 November 2018
Ethics approval and consent to participate
: The project was deemed to be exempt from full review by the UCSF Committee on Human Research (IRB# 15–17,660) which also approved the associated explanatory statement, consent procedure, and survey instruments. We expected all students to participate in the Wikipedia instruction and editing activities as a required assignment in the course. As part of this training, we informed them that their edits (like all edits in Wikipedia) would be accessible by persons within and outside the course and as such, could be used for purposes other than those originally intended. Students could elect to participate in the assignment-related evaluative surveys (ie, pre-assignment, post-training, post-assignment). For this process, we distributed an explanatory statement cover page which informed them that by electing to complete the surveys, they were providing written consent for their aggregated data to be used internally for course improvement and externally for presentation and publication about the project. We advised students that even after consent, they could request that their survey responses be removed from the dataset. To date, no students have requested that their data be removed.
: Not applicable.
: At the time of this work, all authors declare that they had no actual or potential competing financial interests. Since January 2017, AA has served as a paid consultant on a grant from the Hewlett Foundation to promote open educational pedagogy.
: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.