Tranberg, Katrine
Jønsson, Alexandra
Due, Tina
Siersma, Volkert
Brodersen, John Brandt
Bissenbakker, Kristine
Martiny, Frederik
Davidsen, Annette
Kjellberg, Pia Kürstein
Doherty, Kevin
Mercer, Stewart W.
Nielsen, Maria Haahr
Reventlow, Susanne
Møller, Anne
Rozing, Maarten http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0760-6251
,
Funding for this research was provided by:
Royal Library, Copenhagen University Library
Article History
Received: 1 November 2022
Accepted: 25 August 2023
First Online: 16 September 2023
Declarations
:
: The authors declare no competing interests.
: The trial was conducted following the protocol, the Helsinki Declaration in its latest form, good clinical practice guidelines, and followed the rules for informed consent. GPs or practice staff contacted potentially eligible patients and obtained written informed consent. Danish law required no ethical approval for this study because it constituted a quality improvement project decided by the National Committee on Health Research Ethics in Denmark. The waiver of ethical approval was approved by the Center of Regional Development, the Capital Region of Denmark (cf. journal no. 20038096).All participants were anonymized, identifiers altered, and data derived from patients’ medical journals were encrypted. Data were stored and processed per the requirements of European General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR).
: Not applicable.